Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 2008No. 07-4024PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
The district court ordered defendant-appellant John E. Paul to serve a prison term of forty-six months and, upon completion of that term, to undergo frequent drug testing as a condition of his three-year period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3563(a)(5). Paul appeals the order that he undergo drug testing, contending that because he has no history of drug abuse, the court had no ground on which to impose this condition. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the testing.
I
After Paul pleaded guilty to a charge of wire fraud, see 18…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Angelita Greviskes v. Universities Research Association, Incorporated, Doing Business as Fermilab and Fermilab Nal/uraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Stephen R. SinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Larry PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Aaron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.