Legal Opinion

Corker v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 12, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00290Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 BRUCE CORKER, et al., 8 NO. C19-0290RSL Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART 10 RETAILERS’ MOTION TO COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, DISMISS 11 et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on the “Retailers’ Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. 16 Civ. P. 12(b)(6).” Dkt. # 106.1 The question for the Court on a motion to dismiss is whether the 17 facts alleged in the complaint sufficiently state a “plausible” ground for relief. Bell Atl. Corp. v. 18 Twombly,

550 U.S. 544, 570

(2007). 19 A claim…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API