Legal Opinion
In re Sumar
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1988No. M8-85PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEISURE, District Judge:
This motion is brought by petitioner Olga Sumar to compel Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) to produce certain documents and a witness for a deposition pursuant to an Order issued by Judge Broderick and a subpoena, both dated March 11, 1988. Petitioner also seeks the costs of bringing this motion. The deposition and document production were ordered pursuant to a letter rogatory issued by an Argentine court. The Argentine court requested that the Federal District Court of the Southern District of New York assist it in obtaining such discovery.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Olga Sumar…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennwalt Corporation v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Sunkist Growers, Inc., Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- In Re Request for Assistance From Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago Petition of Joseph AzarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Cf & I Steel Corporation, a Colorado Corporation v. Mitsui & Co. (u.s.a.), Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Conway Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Weber v. FinkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- In re Letter of Request from the Supreme Court of Hong KongDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Painewebber Inc. v. Acstar InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re Letters Rogatory of the Federal Capital of the Argentinean RepublicDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.