Legal Opinion

(PS)Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney Office

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 11, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00239Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUNG M NGUYEN, No. 2:21–cv–00239–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS; ORDER DENYING RECUSAL; 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 14 YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 15 (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3) Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, has moved for the undersigned to 18 recuse, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) 19 Plaintiff’s IFP application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API