Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2002No. Docket 121355PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has applied for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals order directing the trial court to immediately revoke his bond. He argues that his pending application for a writ of habeas corpus in a federal court is an “appeal” for the purpose of MCL 770.8, so that he remains entitled to be free on bond. We hold that an application for a writ of habeas corpus is not an appeal within the meaning of MCL 770.8. We thus affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

i

In 1999, defendant conditionally pleaded guilty 1 to a charge of possessing 225 or more grams, but less than 650 grams, of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lesner v. Liquid Disposal, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API