Aaron P. v. Hawaii, Department of Education
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PARENTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND AFFIRMING IN PART AND REMANDING IN PART THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
I. Legal Background
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq., was enacted by Congress to, among other things, “ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education [ (“FAPE”) ] that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs ... [and] to ensure that the rights of children with disabilities…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Education v. S.C. ex rel. Doug C.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- P. v. McKnightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024