Legal Opinion
United States v. Rolando Stockton, United States of America v. Rolando Stockton
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2003No. 02-4093, 02-4139PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Rolando Stockton appeals his convictions for drug conspiracy and for firearms-related offenses committed in connection with that conspiracy. Stockton argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict on each of the counts of conviction, that the district court committed plain error in fading to give the jury a “multiple conspiracies” instruction, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Charles Aaron GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gregory BartkoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ThurstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. Datanet Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.