Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 2011No. Nos. M 07-1827 SI, C 09-5840 SI; MDL No. 1827PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED MOTOROLA COMPLAINT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On November 3, 2010, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss Motorola’s second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) is a technology company that is incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Schaumburg, Illinois. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) ¶ 24. Motorola is a leading manufacturer of mobile wireless devices. Id. From January 1, 1996 until December 11,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011