Legal Opinion
Jones v. Tread Rubber Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided March 4, 2002No. CIV.A. 301CV031WSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ronald Jones, a Mississippi resident, filed the instant action against the defendants, Tread Rubber Corporation (“Tread Rubber”) and Vipal Rubber Corporation (“Vipal”), both Florida Corporations, alleging claims for breach of express and implied warranties and misrepresentation. As a part of each of his claims, the plaintiff also seeks damages for emotional distress.
Defendants Vipal and Tread Rubber have filed separate motions to dismiss. Vipal’s motion, filed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Panda Brandywine Corp. v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Ruston Gas Turbines, Inc. v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Corchran, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Guidry v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madami International, LLC v. Dinli Metal Industrial Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
- El Dorado Oil & Gas, Inc. v. AlanizDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- El Dorado Oil & Gas, Inc. v. AlanizDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024