Legal Opinion

Panda Brandywine Corp. v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2001No. 00-11158PublishedCited by 337 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Panda Brandywine Corporation (“PBC”) and Panda Global Holdings, Inc. (“PGH”) appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Appellee Potomac Electric Power Company. We AFFIRM.

I

Appellants are Delaware corporations that maintain their principal places of business in Dallas, Texas. Appellants are both affiliates of Panda-Brandywine, L.P. (“PBLP”), a Delaware limited partnership of which Appellant PBC is general partner. Appellant PGH is the indirect owner of all of the shares of PBC and is the guarantor of certain bonds issued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by337 opinions

  1. Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Revell v. LidovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Walk Haydel & Associates, Inc. v. Coastal Power Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Sangha v. Navig8 Shipmanagement Private Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. TV Azteca v. RuizTexas Supreme Court · 2016

332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API