Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Middleton v. Klingler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1987No. 15538Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

(specially concurring).

Vendees’ tender of possession of property was simply that and nothing more. Thereby, waste, deterioration, delinquent real estate taxes, or a great depreciation or substantial depreciation in land value would be completely bypassed and vendees would be financially exonerated. To simply hand real estate back, as a vendee, does not, oftentimes, place the vendor in a good position. To the contrary, it can place him in a very bad position. A vendee cannot breach a contract with impunity to avoid not only the principal obligation of the purchase price, but payment of taxes,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sweet v. PurintonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Jones v. TschetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API