Legal Opinion
City of Richmond v. Model Steam Laundry
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 12, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, on an appeal from the police justice of said city.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The defendant in error was fined by the police justice of the city of Richmond for violation of the following ordinance :
“No furnace for melting iron or other metals, or making glass, and no stationary steam engine, designed for use in any mill for planing or sawing boards, or turning wood, or for any other purpose, or in which other fuel than anthracite coal is used to create steam, shall be erected, or put up to be used in this city, unless a permit therefor shall have been first granted by the city council, prescribing the place where the building in which such steam engine or furnace is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. . TenantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- City of Richmond v. DudleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Newton v. BelgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Boyd v. Board of CouncilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- National Linen Service Corp. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Winchester v. GloverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Ex Parte BroussardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913