Legal Opinion

Moody v. Dairyland Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 2003No. 3624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, J.:

Sharon D. Moody brought a declaratory judgment action against her automobile insurance carrier, Dairyland Insurance Company (“Dairyland”), claiming her insurance policy should be reformed to include underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage up to the policy’s statutory minimum liability limits (“statutory minimum limits”) because Dairyland failed to make a meaningful offer of UIM coverage. The circuit court granted Dairyland’s motion for summary judgment. Moody appeals. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 14, 2000, Moody purchased an automobile insurance policy with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Lanham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Public Works v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Burgess v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Traynum v. ScavensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Clinton v. West American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Commissioners of Public Works v. Sc DhecCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API