In re the Personal Restraint of Adolph
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
¶29 (dissenting) — I agree Vincent Adolph’s personal restraint petition is not procedurally barred and is properly before the court. However, because the State’s evidence was not comparable to a certified copy of the judgment and sentence and was insufficient to prove the Lincoln County DUI2 conviction, I dissent.
The State must present evidence comparable to a certified copy of the judgment and sentence of a prior conviction.
¶30 At sentencing “the trial court may rely on no more information than is admitted by the plea agreement, or admitted, acknowledged, or proved in a trial or at the time…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- State v. MorleyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.