Legal Opinion
Matter of Yancey
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The order of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term of the Supreme Court should be reversed, and the petition dismissed, without costs. Aside from the facts that the petition is fatally defective, that there is no proof in the record that the corporate appellant is the true successor of the unincorporated association, and that the unappealed judgment of the Supreme Court in the previous foreclosure action is conclusive upon the parties (Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. Emery, 275 N. Y. 14, 17; Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304; Reich v. Cochran, 151…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernstein v. FriedlanderNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Snitow v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Berlin v. New Hope Holiness Church of God, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Solar Line, Universal Great Brotherhood, Inc. v. PradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Solar Line, Universal Great Brotherhood, Inc. v. PradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012