Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Friedlander
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment in an action to recover the balance due on two bonds executed by religious corporations and upon the guarantees of payment of the same by the individual defendants.
The two congregations involved are Congregation Achpretvia Tal Chaim Shar Hayushor, Inc. (herein designated as Hayushor) and Congregation Rabbi Herschele Lisker (herein designated as Lisker). The individual defendants are Rabbi Solomon Fried-lander, the president of both corporations, and his three sons, two of whom are rabbis, and the defendant Morris Giloni, who is both an obligee and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Diocese of Buffalo v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Putnam County Temple & Jewish Center, Inc. v. Rhinebeck Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. WindhamDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1987
- Wolkoff v. Church of St. RitaNew York Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.