Legal Opinion

Beal v. Stevens

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1887No. 11819PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

The action is to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate, given January 18,1883, by defendants Stevens and Seymour, to secure their five promissory notes of even date with the mortgage, payable to J. S. Loveland, or order, one, two, three, four, and five years from date, with interest specified. The defendants Curtis, Soule, and Stacy are charged in the complaint with having or claiming some interest in the premises, which, if any, is subject to the Loveland mortgage. With respect to every matter, except a certain question of costs, as to which there is a bill of exceptions in the record,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pacific Valley Bank v. SchwenkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. San Joaquin Agricultural Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Berryman v. DoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API