Legal Opinion

Marriage of Sydnes v. Sydnes

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1986No. C1-86-263PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion for permission to remove her children from Minnesota for the purpose of establishing residency in France. Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying her motion because she is the children’s primary caretaker, because the report of the guardian ad litem recommended such removal, and because a provision in the original judgment and decree provides for such removal. She also contends the trial court erred in failing to restructure the original custody arrangement. We affirm the trial court’s denial of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Petersen v. PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Jaramillo v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Marriage of Jorschumb v. JorschumbCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Knott v. KnottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API