Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Three Hundred Ten Thousand Twenty Dollars

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

These consolidated appeals involve the forfeiture of large sums of cash seized by the Pennsylvania State Police from vehicles that had been stopped for speeding. In each case, the trial court granted the Commonwealth’s forfeiture petition because it concluded that the cash had been used for trafficking in illegal drugs. This conclusion was based, inter alia, upon the results of an ion scan of the seized cash that showed trace amounts of cocaine far in excess of the levels expected to be found on currency in general circulation. From these test results and the other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from EsquilinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. One 1988 Ford Coupe Vin 1FABP41A9JF143651Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PerezCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. $9,000 U.S. CurrencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. $15,000 U.S. CurrencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. $17,182.00 U.S. CurrencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API