Legal Opinion

SHAMROCK MOTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1997No. 96-35124PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Ford Motor Company appeals from the United States District Court’s determination that it improperly terminated its dealer franchise agreement with Shamrock Motors, Inc. The case had been removed to the district court from the State of Montana District Court for the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County. However, because the state court proceeding was an appellate review of an administrative proceeding, the district court did not have jurisdiction. Therefore, we vacate and remand.

BACKGROUND

Ford sought to terminate the automobile dealer franchise agreement which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. WMX Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Great American First Savings Bank v. Bayside DevelopersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Shamrock Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. BNSF Railway Co. v. O'DeaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Shoemake v. Mansfield City School District Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Lenoir County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API