McMurray's Administrators v. Hopper
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to tbe District Court of Allegheny county. The facts of this case and points raised by the counsel are sufficiently stated in the opinion of this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered, at Philadelphia, by
Woodward, J.
This was a scire facias, sued out of the District Court, to revive a judgment, transferred from the Court of Common Pleas. The record of the Common Pleas showed that on the 30th March 1838, Joseph McMurray confessed a judgment to Samuel Hopper, before a justice of the peace, whose certified transcript was filed in the Common Pleas on the 3d April 1838 — that to October Term 1841, No. 226, Hopper issued his scire facias to revive this judgment against the administrators of McMurray, and obtained a judgment for $1000 on the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kirk v. Van HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Rushton v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Henry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Biesecker v. CobbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Carson v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897