Carson v. Ford
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 60, Oct. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from restricted judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June Term, 1894, No. 203, on verdict for plaintiff. Sci. fa. to revive judgment. Before Pehnypacker, J. ' It appeared from the evidence that one Michael Roach owned the house 1605 South street and William G. Carson, the plaintiff, had a general judgment against Michael Roach.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 60, Oct. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from restricted judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June Term, 1894, No. 203, on verdict for plaintiff. Sci. fa. to revive judgment. Before Pehnypacker, J. ' It appeared from the evidence that one Michael Roach owned the house 1605 South street and William G. Carson, the plaintiff, had a general judgment against Michael Roach. Annie K. Ford also had claims against Roach and agreed to loan him more money and take a conveyance of the house. Carson, the plaintiff, satisfied his judgment and took the judgment note of Annie K. Ford for his debt and…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
Judgment was originally entered in the court below on a single bill with warrant of attorney to confess judgment, which contained the following proviso: “ Provided, however, that such judgment when entered as aforesaid shall be restricted to and binding only upon the real estate and premises No. 1605 South Street in the City of Philadelphia, now owned by me, and not to affect or bind any other property or estate, real or personal, now owned or which may be hereafter owned by me.” After the death of Annie K. Ford, a scire facias was iésued to revive the judgment against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMurray's Administrators v. HopperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Stanton v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Dean's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860