Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Lakin
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2005No. 30559PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the Court was delivered PER CURIAM.
Justice STARCHER concurs in part, dissents in part and reserves the right to file a separate opinion.
2Per curiam
This lawyer disciplinary matter is before this Court upon the recommendation of the Hearing Panel Subcommittee of the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board that the respondent, L. Thomas Lakin, be prohibited from practicing law in this State for a period of twelve months, subject to limited excep*136tions, and that his law firm, known as the Lakin Law Firm, be prohibited from engaging in certain activities in this State which would constitute…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BlevinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MarkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ChittumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. DutyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.