Legal Opinion

Harden v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1948PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNSON

These ten plaintiffs in error appeal "from a conviction of violating Chapter 89, Public Acts of 1947, Williams’ Code Supplement, Section 11412.14, providing as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any person, or persons, to display, exhibit, handle or use any poisonous or dangerous snake or reptile in such a manner as to endanger the life or health of any person.”

Plaintiffs in error are members of a religious denomination known as ‘ ‘ The Holiness Church. ’ ’ The services in this Church, in so far as the reading of Scripture and. singing of hymns, etc., appear to be conducted as in *20other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Goodwin v. Metropolitan Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Swann v. PackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Public Health Tr. of Dade County v. WonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Wolf v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API