Legal Opinion

Richard Forgues v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1980No. 80-5036PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEÉ CURIAM.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the ex parte order of the district court extending appellant’s period of probation without prior notice to him violated his due process rights. We hold that the extension without prior notice was not a constitutional violation, and, therefore, affirm the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

In 1976 the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin sentenced appellant Richard Forgues to 18 months probation after he entered a plea of guilty to a forgery charge. Forgues’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Paul Darke Cornwell, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Lester Henry CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. KorzuchArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. David William MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Reid v. PautlerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API