Legal Opinion

Padley v. Gregg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1901No. 3957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.

1Per curiam

Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that said appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer. The record showing that the appeal was talten from the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint, the motion must he sustained, as we have decided in Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389 (25 Pac. 330), and Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163 (38 Pac. 1003), that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. The case falls within the rule announced in those cases, and the appeal is dismissed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Mason v. DunbarWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Potvin v. McCorveyWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaktaren Publishing Co. v. Pacific Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Anderson v. East Gate Temple Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Zellar v. SiemensWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Seattle & Northern Railway Co. v. BowmanWashington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API