Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 21, 1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. 564 (1986)
510 A.2d 4
THOMAS P. MAHONEY, AND BARBARA MAHONEY, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., AND CARUS CORPORATION-CARUS CHEMICAL CO. DIVISION; HUNGERFORD & TERRY, INC.; AND INVERSAND COMPANY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 19, 1985.
Reargued March 3, 1986.
Decided May 21, 1986.
William J. Cook argued the cause for appellants (Brown, Connery, Kulp, Wille, Purnell & Greene, attorneys).
F. Herbert Owens, III, argued the cause for respondents Carus Chemical Company, Inc. and…
Also in this document: Dissent · Clifford; Dissent · Handler.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.