Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1927No. 18097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. “When a defendant against whom a verdict has been rendered makes a motion for a new .trial, he can not properly, while the motion is still pending and undisposed of, bring to this court for review any ruling, order, or decision made by the judge during the progress of the case.” Gross v. Wilds, 21 Ga. App. 620 (94 S. E. 812); Kelly & Jones Co. v. Moore, 125 Ga. 382 (54 S. E. 118); Dulce v. Story, 113 Ga. 112 (38 S. E. 337); Carreker v. Thornton, 1 Ga. App. 508 (57 S. E. 988).

2. “When in a given case it should have been obvious that the writ of error was premature, this court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burkhalter v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Duke v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. United Glass Co. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Kelly & Jones Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sellers v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Warm Springs Banking Co. v. RiehleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Grahl v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API