Legal Opinion
Ismael Lozada v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 2017No. 16-15959 Non-Argument CalendarUnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Michael Licari, manager of the Kissim-mee, Florida Hobby Lobby store, called law enforcement to report that one of his employees, Ismael Lozada, was planning a mass shooting. Sheriffs deputies, including Tate Wilson, responded to the store and interviewed Licari, who related a series of troubling conversations among the store’s employees about Lozada. After that interview, Wilson located Lozada and civilly committed him pursuant to Florida’s Baker Act. Fla. Stat. § 394.451 et seq. Lozada was detained for approximately 36 hours. He was released, and no further action was taken against him.
Lozad…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Lea Cordoba v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Nodar v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Archer v. NicholsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Block v. MatesicDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- Block v. MatesicDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- Conch & Coconut, LLC, et al. v. Conch & Coconut Limited, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026
- Moore v. LaSalle Corrections IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.