Legal Opinion

Pic N' Save v. Singleton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 1989No. 89-1099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Employer/carrier petition for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of an order denying their motion to compel a workers’ compensation claimant to authorize oral communication between her physicians and the carrier’s representative. We find that employer/carrier has not shown a departure from the essential requirements of law, and we therefore deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.

At the hearing below it was indicated that claimant’s counsel had requested that any contact with or inquiry of claimant’s physicians be in writing, with a copy of such inquiry, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coralluzzo by and Through Coralluzzo v. FassSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Kirk v. Publix Super MarketsSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Walt Disney World Co. v. SchiebelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Tootle v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Campbell v. Wendy's of South FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API