Legal Opinion
Kirk v. Publix Super Markets
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 30, 1966No. 34444PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
185 So.2d 161 (1966)
Norman KIRK, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34444.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 30, 1966.
Rehearing Denied May 5, 1966.
Robert S. Lyons, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Gerald T. Nolan, Crowley & Nolan, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
O'CONNELL, Justice.
The petitioner-claimant, Norman Kirk, Jr., filed a claim for compensation benefits and remedial treatment. The claim was controverted by the employer. On…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stockham v. StockhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Keating v. State Ex Rel. AusebelSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Florida Real Estate Commission v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Grochowski v. Palm Beach County Ass'n for Retarded ChildrenSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franklin v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- John Gaul Construction Company v. HarbinSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Cirnigliaro v. FLORIDA POLICE STANDARDS, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Horizon Healthcare v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Bloch Bros. v. Board of Business RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.