Legal Opinion
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. United States Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2013No. 11-17199PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
The Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority (Canal Authority) appeals the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment to the Department of Interior (Interior), Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau), San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (San Luis), and Westlands Water Authority (W estlands).
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the district court’s decision on the alternate basis that California Water Code § 11460 does not require the Bureau to provide Central Valley Project contractors priority water rights, because contracts between the Canal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- El Dorado Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- N. Cal. Water Ass'n v. State Water Res. Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- CA Water Assn. v. St. Water Resources Control Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Hiller v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- James Long v. Ingenio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Tehama-Colusa Canal Auth. v. Dep't of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.