Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1898No. S. F. No. 885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order granting a new trial. J. C. B. Hebhard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The Pacific Coast Steamship Company is a common carrier by vessel. Under an agreement and understanding with the board of state harbor commissioners, the com*353pany uses piers Nos. 9 and 11 upon the waterfront in the landing of its vessels. By contract with the Pacific Transfer Company it receives twenty-five per cent of the gross receipts of that company for the exclusive privilege of soliciting upon their piers the carrying of baggage at the times when the passengers on the company’s vessels arrive in port. Morton Brothers, carrying on the same line of business as the Pacific Transfer Company,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schecter v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Moss v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Union Oil Co. v. RideoutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API