Legal Opinion

Kaminski v. Bass

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1997No. S-95-757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide two interrelated issues: Which party carries the burden of proof in a motion for sanctions pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Discovery 37(c) (rev. 1996) and what record is required to be made in such proceedings for purposes of appellate: review.

Virgil J. Kaminski obtained a $2,000 verdict against Evelyn Bass for slander and invasion of privacy. Pursuant to rule 37(c), Kaminski filed a motion to compel Bass to pay his expenses incurred in proving a statement she had denied making during discovery. After a hearing on the motion in which Bass introduced no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Northwestern Life Insurance v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Salazar v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Petition of Omaha Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Nicholas Family Ltd. P'shipNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. Nicholas FamilyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API