Kaminski v. Bass
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide two interrelated issues: Which party carries the burden of proof in a motion for sanctions pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Discovery 37(c) (rev. 1996) and what record is required to be made in such proceedings for purposes of appellate: review.
Virgil J. Kaminski obtained a $2,000 verdict against Evelyn Bass for slander and invasion of privacy. Pursuant to rule 37(c), Kaminski filed a motion to compel Bass to pay his expenses incurred in proving a statement she had denied making during discovery. After a hearing on the motion in which Bass introduced no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Northwestern Life Insurance v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Salazar v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Petition of Omaha Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Nicholas Family Ltd. P'shipNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. Nicholas FamilyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.