Legal Opinion

United States v. Chorney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 29, 2011No. 11-1310UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Harold Chorney, having been ordered in 1994 to pay $569,469 in restitution as part of a criminal sentence, appeals from a recent district court order requiring him to make installment payments of $500 per month. His principal arguments on appeal are that (1) the installment-payment provision is inapplicable and (2) his only two sources of income — a monthly social security benefit and a monthly veterans disability benefit — cannot be considered in determining his financial ability to make such payments.

Each of these arguments raises some knotty questions, as we will briefly explain.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PC) Gutierrez v. ReyersbachDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Allen v. LoDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API