Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Curlee Clothing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1925No. 13674PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Plaintiff clothing company claimed to have sold in the fall of 1918, 34 suits of men’s clotnes to defendant unconditionally, using its usual order form, shipping same in January, 1919, to defendant at Cherokee. In February, defendant sold his store, not including these goods. Soon after the sale, defendant, by clerk and drayman, sent part of the goods to the local railroad depot. In April, some of the goods were forwarded to plaintiff at St. Louis, and in June one box, containing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Ophir Consol. Mines Co. v. BryntesonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Frohman v. BonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hales v. Henry Black, LimitedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. David W. Biow Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Independence Nissan, Inc. v. Vogue Coach Co. (In Re Vogue Coach Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API