Grotte v. Weil & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Dickinson, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Duffie, C.
Charles Grotte, the plaintiff m error, and Katy Grotte were partners engaged in the wholesale liquor business in the city of Omaha, and in July, 1895, the partnership became indebted to Weil & Co., of Cincinnati. On October 2, 1895, Charles Grotte sold his interest in the business to his copartner, Katy Grotte, she on her part agreeing to pay'all outstanding liabilities of the firm and to hold him harmless from the same. October 3, 1895, what appears to be a circular letter was sent to Weil & Co. in which it was stated that Charles Grotte had retired from the firm and had no'…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Millerd v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Mason v. TiffanyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Gates v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Williams v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Faricy v. J. S. Brown Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930