Legal Opinion

Schilling v. Buhne

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1903No. S.F. No. 2718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, commenced an action in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to recover for legal services alleged to have been rendered to defendant. On application of the defendant, the cause was transferred to the superior court of Humboldt County, that county being the place of defendant’s residence. Thereafter the plaintiff applied to said superior court of Humboldt County to have the cause retransferred to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, on the ground that the convenience of witnesses would thereby be subserved, and that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carr v. SternCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Finnell v. FinnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Blossom v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API