Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Marlin

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 18, 1996No. 04-96-00160-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICKHOFF, Justice.

Appellee, Arthur Marlin (“Marlin”), has filed an objection to the assignment of a former justice, the Honorable Antonio G. Cantu, 2 to the panel hearing this appeal. Marlin moves for Justice Cantu’s recusal pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 74.053. 3 Justice Cantu’s assignment of service notification letter states the assignment is pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 75.003 (Vernon Supp.1997). 4 The issue before us, therefore, is whether the automatic objection provision contained in § 74.053 of the Texas Government Code which Marlin relies upon in his motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lanford v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Cabrera v. Cedarapids Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Meuth v. HartgroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Erbs v. Bedard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. LanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Houston Lighting & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. In Re Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  4. Alfredo Martinez Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Marla Cuellar v. Omar Maldonado, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API