Legal Opinion
Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 12, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01436Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17-CV-01436-GPC-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND 14 ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE & DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP; 15 FOR ENTRY OF FINAL QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT JUDGMENT 16 YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a federally-recognized Indian tribe; and 17 [ECF No. 219] DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Williams & Cochrane’s (“W&C”) 21 motion for reconsideration of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Mark A. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.