Legal Opinion

Pace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 2001No. 4D00-1550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Pace’s judgments and sentences and note that during the pendency of the appeal a motion to mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) was filed within which Pace makes a cursory claim that he is entitled to additional credit for jail time served. Pace’s motion was summarily denied by the trial court, and is a non-appealable order. See Adams v. State, 487 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)(holding that an order denying a motion to correct, reduce or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Harriel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Hopping v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API