Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY OLSON, J.:
Appellant, Darnell Brown, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on March 26, 2015. In this case, we consider whether an autopsy report is testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. After careful consideration, we hold that the autopsy report in this case was testimonial and the trial court erred in admitting the autopsy report. The trial court also improperly admitted certain expert testimony relating to the opinions expressed in the autopsy report. We hold, however, that the trial court properly admitted expert testimony expressing independent…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AkrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Brown, J. v. Halpern, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.