Legal Opinion
SSD Control Technology v. Breakthrough Technologies, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1997No. 20A03-9706-CV-201PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
SSD Control Technology (“SSD”) brings this interlocutory appeal from.the denial of its motion to transfer venue from the Elkhart Superior Court to St. Joseph County. The plaintiff, Breakthrough Technologies, Inc. (“BTI”), admits that under Ind. Trial Rule 75(A)(4) St. Joseph County is the county of preferred venue for this breach of contract action. However, BTI argues that a choice of forum provision in the contract on which it is suing allows the dispute to be resolved in Elkhart County.
There are two contracts at issue in this case. BTI’s lawsuit claims that SSD failed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. ConeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- White Truck Sales of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Shelby National Bank of ShelbyvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- MacLeod v. Guardianship of HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Reese v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hilbert v. Conseco Services, L.L.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sullivan Builders & Design, Inc. v. Home Lumber of New Haven, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vigo Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.