Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bartels v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1938No. 8868Published

1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge

I think the petition should be granted. The point of disagreement between us is not whether appellant is entitled to be adjudged a bankrupt. That was decided in Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, 5 Cir., 92 F.2d 404, which apparently is approved by three of the five judges of this circuit, and which is in accord with Massey v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank & Trust Company, 4 Cir., 94 F.2d 526, wherein certiorari was applied for by eminent counsel, and the application was afterward withdrawn prior to a ruling thereon by the Supreme Court. 303 U.S. 665, 58 S.Ct. 761, 82 L.Ed. 1122.

The real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Massey v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Sheets v. LivyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API