Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Roller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1987No. WCB 82-08886, 83-07686; CA A38972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that the referee did not have jurisdiction to review a determination of the Evaluation Division on the extent of claimant’s disability. Claimant cross-petitions, contending that the Board erred in not allowing him attorney fees. We affirm.

Claimant was injured in a mill accident in January, 1980. Employer accepted the claim. Shortly thereafter, claimant was found to be suffering from diabetes melitis, which was ultimately found to be related to the injury and was held compensable. However, in January, 1982, employer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roller v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. SAIF Corp. v. RolesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API