Hardwick v. General Motors Corporation
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion o£ the court was delivered by
Price, C. J.:
The only question presented in this workmen’s compensation case concerns the liability of the “second injury fund” (K. S. A. 44-566, et seq., as amended) for all or a portion of the award to an injured workman.
The respondent employer, General Motors Corporation, a self-insurer, has appealed from a judgment that the second injury fund was “not involved” and that respondent solely was liable for payment of the award.
Before going into the facts we refer to pertinent provisions of the statute. References are to K. S. A.
44-566 ( 4) defines a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Leiker v. Manor House, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arduser v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- Hinton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Oates v. Post & Danley Truck LinesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Spencer v. Daniel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Stanley v. a & a IRON WORKSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.