Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1997No. 24702Published

1DissentToal, Justice

I dissent, in part, because I differ with the portion of the majority’s opinion which bears on the issue of abuse of process. As there was evidence of abuse of process to withstand a directed verdict motion, the trial court properly submitted the issue to the jury. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals should be reversed.

The leading South Carolina case on the issue of abuse of process is Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 249 S.C. 206, 153 S.E.2d 693 (1967). The case sets forth the following definition of abuse of process:

The essential elements of abuse of process, as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Sierra v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Broadmoor Apts. of Charleston v. HorwitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API