Meyers v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, the Pennsylvania Steel Company, from an, interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 1st day of April, 1902, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling said defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
This is an action by a taxpayer to restrain the further execution of a contract in writing, made prior to the commencement of this action between the commissioners of the New East River Bridge and the appellant, for the steel and masonry approaches on the Manhattan and Brooklyn sides of the New East River Bridge.
*308One of the grounds of the demurrer is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This court recently affirmed without opinion a decision of the Special Term sustaining a demurrer to a similar complaint in a similar action upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Rodgers v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People ex rel. Rodgers v. ColerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Meyers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Knowles v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1902
- Meyers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Knowles v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902