Legal Opinion

Tax Matrix Technologies, LLC v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-6223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, DISTRICT JUDGE.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. .162

A. • The Letter Agreement... 162

B. Prior Dealings Between the Parties ...164

C. The Maryland Audit.. ,164

D. Tax Matrix Rewrites Standard Agreement.. .167

E. Tax Matrix’s Invoice and the Parties’ Discussions Concerning Alternative Fee Arrangements... 168

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY... 169

III. STANDARD OF REVIEW... 17Í

IV. TAX MATRIX’S BREACH of CONTRACT CLAIM.. .171

A. Tax Matrix’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to its Breach of Contract Claim... 174 ‘

1. Plain Meaning of the Contingency Fee Provision... 174

a. The- “Shall Mean”…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capitalkeys, LLC v. Democratic Republic of CongoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. BOSCOV'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. v. AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. BRAND DESIGN COMPANY, INC. v. RITE AID CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Bark U, LLC v. Terwisscha Construction, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. C.J. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. v. EQM GATHERING OPCO, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API