Lydon v. Allstate Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment awarding him. $213.04, claiming that the award should have been $17,654.16, the amount of commissions allegedly earned and accrued under his contract of employment with the defendant. There was no error. It is agreed that the contract was properly terminated. The intent of the parties entering into the contract must be gathered from construing the contract as a whole and not by placing special emphasis on any one part. Ucello v. Cosentino, 354 Mass. 48, 51 (1968). The trial judge correctly interpreted the agreement as a personal services contract which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hiller v. Submarine Signal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Ucello v. CosentinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
- Miller v. Allstate InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Walbrook Insurance Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Willitts v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Winchester Gables, Inc. v. Host Marriott Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Basile v. Frank Frederick Construction Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
- Commercial v. WalbrookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.